Cases 1 - 10 of 312
Perry v. Lizotte
as 24-1491
Petitioner:
FREDERICK H. PERRY
Respondent:
KEN LIZOTTE, Superintended for MCI
US v. Perry
as 24-1437
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
KEVIN A. PERRY, JR.
Interested Party:
CORNERSTONE BANK, EAGLE ACORN ACRES, LLC, BAY STATE SAVINGS BANK and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, MD, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Callahan v. Giammarco, RN et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ryan Callahan
Defendant:
Bianca Giammarco, RN, David Sasso Jr., APRN, LT. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERRY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
DAMIAN PERRY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fruzzetti v. Town Counsel Chair, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff:
LEE FRUZZETTI
Defendant:
TOWN COUNSEL CHAIR, Town of Plymouth, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANIEL PERRY, Easton Police Detective and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2024cv10520
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley, Devol Pond Association, The 2021 Hadley Family Real Estate Trust and others
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
