Cases 51 - 60 of 841,989
SANDERS v DIRECTOR JOHN OR JANE DOE et al
as 2:2024cv09537
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANDERS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR JOHN OR JANE DOE and SIR PAROLE OFFICER PHIEEFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Infante v. Fuentes-Campo
as 1:2024cv07391
Plaintiff:
Joseph S. Infante
Defendant:
Chelsey Fuentes-Campo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
F. et al v. Department of Education
as 1:2024cv07381
Plaintiff:
J. S. and E. F.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Goddard v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00910
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff:
James Goddard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022
Tamara R. Ulmes v. Matheson Tris Gas, Inc. et al.
as 3:2024cv01679
Defendant:
Ronald Toland and Matheson Tris Gas, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamara R. Ulmes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Metz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01671
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Metz
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
KIDD v. BERNARD et al
as 5:2024cv05214
Plaintiff:
SHAHEED KIDD
Defendant:
S & S TRANSPORTERS, INC. and ROBERT BERNARD, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BENNETT v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05232
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
MARTHA BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
MILLER v. NOVO NORDISK, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05242
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
