Cases 31 - 40 of 827,881
Reynolds et al v. Rendelman et al
as 3:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Reynolds, Jovie Brown and Shaneka S. Hollmon
Defendant:
Joshua A. Rendelman and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Holloway
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant:
Ronald S. Holloway, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Green v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01475
Plaintiff:
Brounche S. Green
Defendant:
R. Hill and Folsom State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massenburg et al v. Tindle
as 8:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Tony Massenburg and Lanie Nikes
Defendant:
Doranna Tindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
(PC) Bonilla v. Calaveras County Court Clerk's Office Employees
as 2:2024cv01352
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubin Development and Construction, Inc. v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv03666
Plaintiff:
Rubin Development and Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company, James River Insurance Company and AXIS Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1154
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1153
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
