Cases 1 - 10 of 629
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PARKER v. WILLIAMS et al
as 5:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
JOE WILLIAMS and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC & CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frederick Ford v. Anthony Parker, et al
as 24-11748
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ANTONIO FORD
Defendant:
ANTHONY PARKER and TRAVIS YIELDER
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jerry Parker v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11563
Petitioner:
JERRY L. PARKER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
PARKER v. BARNHART
as 5:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
VRAIMONE GERMAINE PARKER
Defendant:
BARNHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
Kim Florence v. District Attorney of Columbus, et al
as 24-11037
Plaintiff:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COLUMBUS, MAYOR OF COLUMBUS, SHERIFF OF COLUMBUS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
