Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in Alabama matching ""AT&T Mobility""
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,726
Claims Holding Group, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2024cv24064
Plaintiff: Claims Holding Group, LLC
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Claims Holding Group, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 1:2024cv24065
Plaintiff: Claims Holding Group, LLC
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01883
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00844
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01268
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Wallace v. AT&T Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff: Cindy Wallace
Defendant: AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodgers v. T-Mobile et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Tonya Sharity Rodgers
Defendant: Candice Newton, Sherlisa Thomas, T-Mobile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Schulte v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00112
Defendant: AT&T Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: CHRIS SCHULTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Varela v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 3:2024cv02527
Respondent: AT&T Mobility LLC
Petitioner: Marcela Varela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Young v. AT&T Mobility, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant: AT&T Mobility, LLC and AT&T Inc.
Plaintiff: Lori Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?