Cases 21 - 30 of 81
Donald Sanderson v. D. Marshall, et al
as 13-14207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD RAY SANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. T. MARSHALL, Sheriff, in their official capacity, DON BARNWELL, KEVIN WILLIAMS and others
Lindsey v. Montgomery County Commission et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Andert Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Montgomery County Commission, D. T. Marshall, Wanda Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
David O. Oliver
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, D. T. Marshall and Wanda Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 2:2012cv04060
Plaintiff:
David Oliver
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, D T Marshall and Wanda Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-14253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Anderson, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Albert King
Defendant:
Officer Anderson , D. T. Marshall , Wanda J. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. D T Water Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Heather Gonzalez
Defendant:
D T Water Corporation and Dale Mast
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGuire v. City of Montgomery, et al
as 2:2011cv01027
Plaintiff:
Michael A. McGuire
Defendant:
Kevin J. Murphy , D. T. Marshall , Hugh B. McCall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Marshall, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Johnson
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall , Col. Roberson , Maj. Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Marshall et al(MAG+)
as 2:2011cv00950
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Monique Couch
Defendant:
D. T. Marshall and Dante' Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
