Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Chambers et al v. Groome Transportation of Alabama, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00237
Plaintiff:
Nettie Chambers , Annie L. Adams , Johnny Allmond and others
Defendant:
Groome Transportation of Alabama, Inc., Harold V. Groome, Jr., Harold V. Groome, III and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wilson v. Scarbrough et al
as 1:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Zachery Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Scarbrough, Ashley Kidd, Gary Hetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Patterson et al
as 1:2012cv00086
Plaintiff:
Arthur Earl Thompson
Defendant:
Warden Patterson, Warden Bishop, Capt. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborne v. Patterson et al
as 1:2011cv00638
Plaintiff:
Korrin Osborne
Defendant:
Tony Patterson, Dexter Brown, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-11365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Broadhead v. English et al
as 1:2010cv00662
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
James English, Michael Watson and Ashworth Penton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson et al v. Flagship Financial Group, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv03337
Plaintiff:
Michael Watson and Shannon Watson
Defendant:
Flagship Financial Group, LLC and Sally A. Farrar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cunningham v. Culliver et al
as 1:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Cunningham, Jr.
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Watson Bishop, C. T. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Culliver et al
as 1:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Leviticus Pruitt
Defendant:
Grantt Culliver, Tyrone Jenkins, Michael Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv02297
Plaintiff:
Michael Watson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
