Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Robinson v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv01247
Defendant:
Barr, Allen, T Schult and others
Plaintiff:
Lutha James Robinson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabtree v. USAble Life
as 2:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
Chandler Ryan Crabtree
Defendant:
USAble Life
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Shelton v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv00941
Defendant:
Charles Thompson, Chadwick Crabtree, John Doe Correctional Officer 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRABTREE et al v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
ALITA EDEKER and ERIC CRABTREE
Defendant:
AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Doe v. The Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00455
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Chadwick Crabtree, Jeremy Pelzer and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Crabtree et al
as 6:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Stephen D Brewer
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bruno v. Crabtree (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Damion Joseph Bruno
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Vernus Miles
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Tony Lee Smith
Respondent:
Phillip Mitchell and A.D.O.C.
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaspard v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Travell Gaspard
Defendant:
Warden C Crabtree, Warden Streeter and Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
