Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Echenique v. Biden et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00534
Defendant:
Lamela Solomon, Julian Lennon, Joe Biden and others
Plaintiff:
Ivette T. Echenique
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floyd et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00663
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory Floyd, William Paul Ernst, Larry Layne Eshleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Harmon v. Smith (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Korey Devon Harmon
Defendant:
Shamal K. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Westley Devone Harris
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Ray et al
as 2:2022cv00802
Plaintiff:
Elie Frank Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Brandon Devon Ray and J B Hunt Transport Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mayo-Keller v. SDH Pizza Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Devone Mayo-Keller
Defendant:
SDH Pizza Inc and Steven Douglas Hall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Easley v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2022cv00444
Plaintiff:
Devon Martez Easley
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snipe v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 3:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Quentavius Devon Snipe
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
