Cases 1 - 10 of 778
Physician's Central Business Office & Affiliates, et al v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 24-10817
Plaintiff:
PHYSICIAN'S CENTRAL BUSINESS OFFICE & AFFILIATES, MARIA CRISTINA CRESPO-SMITH, NESTOR JAVECH and others
Defendant:
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Culmer v. JSO Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. Culmer
Defendant:
JSO Sheriffs Department, L. W. Long, Reese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Huggins et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Reese
Defendant:
Thomas Huggins and Blake Turman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goorman v. Served with Honor LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60293
Plaintiff:
Bradley Gary Goorman
Defendant:
Served with Honor LLC, Madison Atrina LLC doing business as District Lending, Josh Rapaport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Thompson v. Zorn
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Reese J. Thompson
Defendant:
Benjamin Luke Zorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Property Damage
Williams v. City of Birmingham et al
as 2:2023cv01742
Plaintiff:
Wendie Williams
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, Joshua Yates, Danita Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
USA v. Reese Clarke
as 24-10343
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
REESE CLARKE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 883 Violation of US Coastal Law
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
