Cases 31 - 40 of 832,219
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024at00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Baker v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Melissa Rochelle Baker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Caplan v. Rysavy Enterprises Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv61153
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Rysavy Enterprises Inc. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Latour Fire Equipment Co and Priscilla Joan Rysavy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
PATEL v. DEFENDANT "1" et al
as 2:2024cv07502
Plaintiff:
KARTIK PATEL
Defendant:
DEFENDANT "1", DEFENDANT "2", DEFENDANT "3" and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
EDWARDS v. HIGBY
as 2:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
JERRY EDWARDS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY HIGBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontaine v. Dickinson et al
as 5:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Antonio Fontaine
Defendant:
S. Dickinson, J. Rogers and FNU Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
GAMBRELL et al v. STANCIL et al
as 1:2024cv01853
Plaintiff:
CARL GAMBRELL, MICHAEL HANSON, ALEXANDER HINKLE and others
Defendant:
MOSES STANCIL, AMANDA RETTING and KIMBERLY KLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
