Cases 41 - 50 of 827,896
Harding-Barrow et al v. Wal-Mart Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Lois Harding-Barrow and Lawrence Barrow, Jr.
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Wal-Mart Louisiana, LLC, Wal-Mart Stores Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) Bonilla v. Calaveras County Court Clerk's Office Employees
as 2:2024cv01352
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rubin Development and Construction, Inc. v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv03666
Plaintiff:
Rubin Development and Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company, James River Insurance Company and AXIS Surplus Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1154
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1153
Petitioner:
NACCO Natural Resources Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Laughrey v. Commandant
as 24-3073
Petitioner:
JAMES A. LAUGHREY
Respondent:
COMMANDANT, Midwest Joint Regional Correctional Facility
Stockamp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Stockamp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Wendy M. v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Wendy Ann Medina
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
