Cases 61 - 70 of 465,644
Garr v. USA
as 1:2024cv00557
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Oliver Lucian Garr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zhu v. Home Depot USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03781
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc. and Michaelangelo Duarte DeLeon
Plaintiff:
Junfang Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NBTC US INC. v. Hashland Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00891
Defendant:
DouDou Wen, Zhu Yongjun, Di Wu and others
Plaintiff:
NBTC US INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Caldwell v. USA
as 1:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Janson Caldwell
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jenkins v. USA
as 4:2024cv00116
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrell Jamal Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCI DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
MCI DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TECHNICAL AND PROJECT ENGINEERING, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
TECHNICAL AND PROJECT ENGINEERING, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
USA v. Approx. $269,565.50 seized from First Reliance Bancshares, Inc. et al
as 2:2024at01257
Defendant:
Approximately $36,650.38 seized from Bank of America, N.A., Approximately $269,565.50 seized from First Reliance Bancshares, Inc., Approximately $37,886.31 seized from Southstate Bank, NA and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lavi v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv08528
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz of Beverly Hills and Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Plaintiff:
David Lavi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
