Cases 261 - 270 of 832,219
Staffney v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv11678
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Robert A. Benson, David G. Kamm and others
SEIF v. DORVAL TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv07350
Plaintiff:
ADAM SEIF
Defendant:
DORVAL TRANSPORT, INC., BHUPINDER NIJJAR, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Thorne v. USPS
as 6:2024cv01181
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Thorne
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Raymond v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2024cv03566
Plaintiff:
Jackie Raymond
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07351
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
POSANTE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02858
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY POSANTE
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Yeh et al
as 2:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com Inc, Amazon.com Services LLC, The Black & Decker Corporation and others
Defendant:
Hsin Ting Yeh, Anthony Chen and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Harmon v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02851
Plaintiff:
Stacie Harmon
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
