Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Riddick v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jerome Riddick
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddick et al
as 1:2023cv08735
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Riddick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Riddick v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv06649
Plaintiff:
Cedric Riddick
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richardson v. McMahon
as 22-582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewu Richardson
Defendant / Appellee:
James McMahon, City of Waterbury, Edward Mills and others
Defendant:
Rivera, Police Officer, Individual and Official Capacities, Querino Maia, Sgt., Individual and Official Capacities, Vernon Riddick, Chief, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Poteat v. Hartford Housing et al
as 3:2021cv01432
Plaintiff:
Kennara Poteat
Defendant:
Hartford Housing, Enfield Housing, CHRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Green Mountain Holdings (Cayman) Ltd. v. Cindy Sonds et al
as 2:2021cv05315
Defendant:
Cindy Sonds, Cindy Riddick, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Green Mountain Holdings (Cayman) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riddick v. Christine
as 2:2021cv04277
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Riddick
Defendant:
Christine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merholz et al v. McMahon et al
as 3:2021cv00789
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, ManJit Singh, Stuart U. Goldfarb and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jimenez and Ryan B. Merholz
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Riddick v. Saul
as 1:2020cv05396
Plaintiff:
Dwight Riddick and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
