Cases 11 - 20 of 841,216
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk11635
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
U.S. Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woods et al v. Packaging Corporation of America
as 1:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
Nakia Ezell and Loretta Woods
Defendant:
Packaging Corporation of America and H&M Construction Company, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Coram v. Harris et al
as 4:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Billy Lee Coram
Defendant:
Rick Elliott, Jonesboro, City of and Joseph Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Pratcher v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00178
Defendant:
C Garrett
Plaintiff:
Derek Pratcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Murry v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murry
Defendant:
Robert Doyle, Leon Fields, Savanna Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00168
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jean Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. Usrey et al
as 3:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Ferrari Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Roll Em Up Franchise Group, LLC and Ryan C. Usrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Mysterious, LLC v. Foshan City Hongdeng Trading Co., Ltd.
as 3:2024cv01707
Plaintiff:
Mysterious, LLC
Defendant:
Foshan City Hongdeng Trading Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement (definitions)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
