Cases 51 - 60 of 827,712
Carrillo v. Toshiba
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Toshiba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burkes v. Attorneys Information Exchange Group, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Teresa R. Burkes
Defendant:
Attorneys Information Exchange Group, INC., Westin Birmingham Operator, LLC and Marriott Hotel Services, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Osborne v. Hunter Warfield Inc
as 2:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Tashon Osborne
Defendant:
Hunter Warfield Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carrillo v. Quik Trip Stores
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Quik Trip Stores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Original Bangladeshi American Association of Connecticut (BAAC), Inc. v. Bangladeshi American Association of Connecticut (BAAC), Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Original Bangladeshi American Association of Connecticut (BAAC), Inc. doing business as Bangladeshi American Association of Connecticut (BAAC), Inc.
Defendant:
Bangladeshi American Association of Connecticut (BAAC), Inc., Bangladeshi American Assiciation of CT (BAAC), Inc., Bangladeshi American Association of CT (BAAC), Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Farner v. Redmond et al
as 3:2024cv50193
Plaintiff:
Joshua S. Farner
Defendant:
Robert Redmond, Justin Egler and Major Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk07611
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024bk71956
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
