Cases 101 - 110 of 3,620
Woodbury Wireless LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Woodbury Wireless LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC, AT&T MOBILITY LLC II and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lettieri v. Department of Justice
as 24-676
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI, (John Doe)
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, WYOMING COUNTY SHERIFFS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Brown et al v. Metro By T-Mobile et al
as 2:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Keneshia Brown, Kenny Brown, Kendra Brown and others
Defendant:
Metro By T-Mobile, T-Mobile US, Inc. and Does Does 1 to 50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hrusovsky v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Robert Hrusovsky
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
RightQuestion, LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
RightQuestion, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Corp., AT&T Mobility LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
