Cases 121 - 130 of 221
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06388
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Treanor v. Treanor
as 12-3557
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Laura Holland Treanor
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Ready Treanor, Jr.
Floyd County et al v. Federal Housing Finance Agency et al
as 4:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
Floyd County and Barbara Penson
Defendant:
Federal Housing Finance Agency , Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MDL No. 2357 - IN RE: Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 3:2012cv00325
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., dba Zappos.com
Plaintiff:
Brooke C. Brown, Tara J. Elliott, Ms. Dahlia Habashy and others
In Re:
Zappos.com, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Francis v. Teamsters Local 814 Pension Fund et al
as 1:2012cv04489
Plaintiff:
Eileen Francis
Defendant:
Teamsters Local 814 Pension Fund , The Board of Trustees of Teamsters Local 814 Penson Fund and Local 814 International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Unnamed vs. Unnamed
as 1:2012cv04175
Petitioner:
Unnamed
Respondent:
Unnamed
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Mertz v. Hardy
as 1:2012cv04174
Petitioner:
Anthony B. Mertz
Respondent:
Marcus Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Penson v. Farris et al
as 2:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Penson
Defendant:
Farris, P Jones, T C Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
