Cases 91 - 100 of 163
Torney v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Austin M. Torney, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Catherine O'Malley, Cathy Serrette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
MARINKOVIC v. BATTAGLIA et al
as 1:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
M. MARINKOVIC
Defendant:
DAVID K. BATTAGLIA, ROBERT T. BOWER, RICHARD L. FINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. S&S AUTOMOTIVE SALES, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00775
Plaintiff:
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
S&S AUTOMOTIVE SALES, INC. and TROY FINK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mann et al v. Palmerton Area School District et al
as 3:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mann and Rose Mann
Defendant:
Palmerton Area School District , Palmerton Area School District Board of Education , Palmerton Area High School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Porter v. Warden Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 13-4588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER L. PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN HUNTINGDON SCI, ROOFNER, Deputy, SCHILLINGS, Lieutenant and others
BIESIADA v. LAKEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2013cv06935
Plaintiff:
ARLENE BIESIADA
Defendant:
LAKEWOOD BOARD OF EDUCATION, CARL FINK, LAURA WINTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FINK v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2013cv03370
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. FINK
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. BISHOP, KAYDON A. STANZIONE, JOSEPH M. TROUPE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
FINK v. COLVIN
as 5:2013cv02822
Plaintiff:
CAROL L. FINK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2100
Debtor - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FINK v. ASTRUE
as 2:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
MANDY M. FINK
Defendant:
CAROLYN COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 (g) Social Security (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
