Cases 11 - 20 of 144
James ClarkIn re: James Clark
as 22-2325
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Bryant v. United States Marshals Service
as 22-1046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD BRYANT
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
USA v. James Bryant
as 21-3344
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD BRYANT
James ClarkIn re: James Clark
as 21-2198
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EDWARD CLARK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HAMILTON et al v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv11936
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE ELIZABETH HAMILTON and JAMES EDWARD HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2021cv07229
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUSOK v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv00092
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK CAPOZZA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD HUSOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SOLOMON v. OFFICER T. BLEWITT
as 3:2020cv12725
Defendant:
OFFICER T. BLEWITT
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD SOLOMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLANK v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02507
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD PLANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
