Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WILSON v. GALLAGHER et al
as 2:2011cv04352
Plaintiff: LEROY A. WILSON
Defendant: JOHN GALLAGHER, REBECCA MOLYLESKI, STEVEN DICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. GALLAGHER et al
as 2:2011cv01876
Plaintiff: LEROY A. WILSON
Defendant: JOHN GALLAGHER, REBECCA MOLYLESKI, STEVEN DICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-4528
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
LYNCH v. RAMSEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv03436
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LYNCH
Defendant: CHARLES RAMSEY, JOHN GAITTENS, ROBERT SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEDDINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2007cv05112
Plaintiff: WARREN WEDDINGTON
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CHERYL GEORGE, STEPHANIE BLACKWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAFFNEY v. DELAWARE VALLEY VETERANS HOME et al
as 2:2007cv01670
Plaintiff: ROBERT GAFFNEY and ROBERT GAFFNEY
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 13, SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 88, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?