Cases 21 - 30 of 65
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv00790
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL
as 2:2019cv02731
Defendant:
MARK HICE, HARRY CANCELMI, T.A. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv02231
Defendant:
SUPT. FERGUSON, SUPT. GILMORE, DEPUTY DIALASANDRO and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHMIEL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01691
Defendant:
CHCA WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. MIN HI PARK, DR. SMYTH and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHMIEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollock v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) et al
as 1:2018cv01731
Plaintiff:
Michael Pollock
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC), Arif Shaikh, M.D., Stephanie Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMYTH et al
as 2:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLES J. SMYTH and RUSTINA SMYTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
SMYTH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMYTH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Bayliss v. Borough of Darby, et al
as 16-4347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOROUGH OF DARBY, DARBY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROBERT SMYTHE and others
CASSY v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2016cv04585
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASSY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY and ROBERT SMYTHE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BAYLISS v. BOROUGH OF DARBY et al
as 2:2015cv05739
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES BAYLISS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF DARBY , DARBY BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT , ROBERT SMYTHE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
