Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01452
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01453
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv12807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Andre Howerton v. Steven Kandarian, et al
as 19-1674
Defendant / Appellee:
METLIFE, The Insurance Company and VISA, The Corporation Visa
Defendant:
ALFRED F. KELLY, JR., CEO of Visa, SUPERVISOR DAVE, A Manager for Visa, CONTESSA SEGURA, An Employee in Human Resource for Visa and others
Not Yet Classified:
LATIA MANIGAULT, A MINOR J. M. and MARC MCCOY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE L. HOWERTON
RHINES v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv06945
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL RHINES and MARY LOU RHINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
M. et al v. SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 2:2018cv04082
Plaintiff:
R. E. M., J. M. and R. M.
Defendant:
SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, SCOTT ZGRAGGEN, CHARLES RITTENHOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
JAMES v. BUSH et al
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JAMES
Defendant:
BUSH, J. M. BOYLES and B. D. HEIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2017cv01520
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Francis Pirozolla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
