Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 5,489
Ayers v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff: Patrick Ayers
Defendant: Quentin Blackford, Bruce G. Bodaken, Karen Ling and others
ORLIK v. WALMART INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06216
Plaintiff: KEVIN ORLIK
Defendant: WALMART INC., WALMART SUPERCENTER, WALMART SUPERCENTER #5867 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CMPC USA, INC. v. GWSI, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff: CMPC USA, INC.
Defendant: GWSI, Inc., M. Gerace Enterprises, Inc., KEVIN BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Kevin Livsey v. USA
as 24-1864
Plaintiff: KEVIN LIVSEY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MILLER v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff: STEVEN MILLER
Defendant: ERIC TICE, KEVIN TURNER, T. Knepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAH v. TURNER III et al
as 3:2024cv05988
Plaintiff: PETER I. SHAH
Defendant: JOHN G. TURNER III, PATRICIA M. KIPNIS, ELLIOTT C. MCGRAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv02007
Plaintiff: KEVIN BROOKS
Defendant: FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Danny Valentine Shabazz v. Sovereign Sweets, et al
as 24-1865
Plaintiff: DANNY AMEN VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant: SOVEREIGN SWEETS, VINCENT WATSON, ANDRE DICKENS and others
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant: BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff: CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant: RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?