Cases 21 - 30 of 40
DAVIS v. NEIL et al
as 2:2012cv05539
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
ANNA NEIL and DESIRE KAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. County of Allegheny, et al
as 12-1571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, and its Agencies, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA
DAVIS v. THOMPSON
as 2:2012cv00061
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRAUN et al v. RED OAK ACQUISITION CORP., et al
as 3:2011cv00166
Defendant:
GEORGE T. HORNYAK, JR., RICHARD U. NIEDT, MERCER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J. BRAUN, JAYNE K. BRAUN and JANEL BRAUN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUBIN v. MERCER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2010cv06816
Plaintiff:
ELCHANAN RUBIN
Defendant:
MERCER INSURANCE GROUP, INC. , UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY , RED OAK ACQUISITION CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: Thomas Davi
as 10-2844
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY PRISON
Garnishee - Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER
DAVIS v. THE WARDEN OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2010cv00538
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE WARDEN OF THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and THE SUPERINTENDENT OF S.C.I. MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas Davis v. County of Allegheny, et al
as 10-2143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, DA ALGHNY and PD OFC OF ALGHNY CTY
DAVIS v. THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY et al
as 2:2009cv01452
Petitioner:
THOMAS DAVIS
Respondent:
THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATTORNEY and OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
