Cases 31 - 40 of 142
FRACTION, JR. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv08527
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD FRACTION, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J.R. et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv03465
Plaintiff:
J.R. , JILL RICHARDS , ANGELA BALSEWICZ and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
James Edwards v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 17-2662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE SERVICES and others
HEALY v. BURNS MECHANICAL INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01074
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD HEALY
Defendant:
BURNS MECHANICAL INC., COMCAST INC. and L.F. DRISCOLL CO.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. DOC HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
DOC HOUTZDALE, JOYNER and SHERYL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of James Edward Thompso, et al v. James Phillips, et al
as 16-4123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESTATE OF JAMES EDWARD THOMPSON, through Richard Marshall Thompson, Administrator, RICHARD THOMPSON and DEBORAH THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES PHILLIPS and JOYCE PHILLIPS
STANLEY v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06957
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD STANLEY, SR.
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2016cv05623
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARDS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, DIVISION OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTIVE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ebbert
as 3:2016cv01863
Petitioner:
James Edward King, III
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PENDER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv04955
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PENDER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
