Cases 41 - 50 of 148
USA v. Jose Santos-Matos
as 19-2642
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE SANTOS-MATOS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MATOS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv14697
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
WANDA MATOS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VELEZ v. WALCZAK et al
as 2:2019cv02915
Plaintiff:
JUAN MATOS VELEZ
Defendant:
GREG WALCZAK and MERIDIAN CONTRACTORS AND CONSULTANTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ZACK v. MATOS
as 5:2019cv01834
Defendant:
FRANCIS MATOS
Plaintiff:
CHERYL LEE ZACK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAMIREZ v. SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS et al
as 5:2019cv01295
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, SUPT. SCI CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS, COM OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Petitioner:
GENESIS MATOS RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPECIAL POLICE ORGANIZATION OF NEW JERSEY v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv08444
Plaintiff:
JABREE BELL, KYLE BROWN, TUWAN FLOYD and others
Defendant:
ANTHONY AMBROSE, CITY OF NEWARK, HARRY ROES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
KUKU v. WILSON et al
as 2:2018cv14333
Plaintiff:
CAPTAIN ADEKUNIE KUKU
Defendant:
EJIKE UZOR and HON. MARCELLA MATOS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELGENDY v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv13105
Defendant:
OFFICER M. HARBA, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER VICTOR MATOS
Plaintiff:
ABDEL ELGENDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ELGENDY v. ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv13105
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
OFFICER M. HARBA, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER VICTOR MATOS
Plaintiff:
ABDEL ELGENDY
3Rd Party Defendant:
JAIRO HOYOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MATOS v. COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv03039
Defendant:
COMMAND SECURITY CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ARNALDO MATOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
