Cases 51 - 60 of 166
SESSOMS et al v. PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv17060
Defendant:
PARADE MANAGEMENT LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MAHESH PATEL, BHAVESH PATEL and others
Plaintiff:
TITANIA LYLES, LASHIDA SESSOMS, TRINA PEREIRA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01069
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
YOUNGER v. WEAVER et al
as 2:2019cv00966
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNGER
Defendant:
DEYT ANTHONY BEATTY, SGT JIM GLICK, DETECTIVE JANINE TRIOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gregory Ferrentino v. City of Atlantic City, et al
as 19-2759
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BEATTIE, CHRISTIAN GARAFOLA, GEORGE ADAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY FERRENTINO
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY
Shavez HoldenIn re: Shavez Holden
as 19-2687
Not Yet Classified:
SGT. KOPCHICK, C.O. 2, S.C.I. Forest, In re: SHAWVEZ NELSON A/K/A SHAVEZ HOLDEN, ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, Chief Hearing Examiner and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
BEATTY v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 1:2019cv00184
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF VENANGO COUNTY and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
PAUL WILLIAM BEATTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. KOHN et al
as 2:2019mc00111
Defendant:
FUTURE INCOME PAYMENTS, LLC and SCOTT A. KOHN
Not Yet Classified:
BEATTIE B. ASHMORE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv06260
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
