Cases 51 - 60 of 1,561
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv21589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
GRIFFIN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv01891
Plaintiff:
MARIO GRIFFIN
Defendant:
MS. WALKER, DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, MAC JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. LUQUIS et al
as 2:2023cv04657
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIVERA
Defendant:
JAIME LUQUIS and DAVID COULEHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.R. et al v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03880
Plaintiff:
A.R., NAOMIS RIVERA SAEZ and LUIS OSCAR HERNANDEZ CRUZ
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, INC., TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., CLINTON A. TURNER, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Medical Malpractice
RIVERA v. FINN et al
as 5:2023cv04424
Plaintiff:
JESSICA RIVERA
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER MARISSA FINN, CHIEF CHARLES ROCA, John/Jane Does 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIVERA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2023cv22785
Plaintiff:
LISETTE RIVERA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PETTIES v. AHMAD et al
as 2:2023cv22662
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DEROME PETTIES
Defendant:
OFFICER AHMAD, OFFICER MEADE and OFFICER RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHENCK-FAISON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2023cv22437
Plaintiff:
J'QUAN SCHENCK-FAISON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICER T.M. BROWN, SGT. ABRAHAM JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leslie Rivera v. USA
as 23-2732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESLIE RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
