Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MARSHALL v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
CAROLE MAE MARSHALL
Defendant:
WARDEN DONALD J LOMBARDO, CAPTAIN MAYQUIL, LT. CAMBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Endrikat v. Ransom et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
Robert Endrikat
Defendant:
Ransom, George Miller, J Cirelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT et al v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2015cv01346
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYANT, SR. and DAVID L. SINGLETON
Defendant:
PETE HERMAN MATTHEWS, BOBBY DAVIS, MIKE KEB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roger Porter v. Warden Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 13-4588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER L. PORTER
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN HUNTINGDON SCI, ROOFNER, Deputy, SCHILLINGS, Lieutenant and others
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PORTER v. HOGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
ROGER L. PORTER
Defendant:
HOGUE, ROOFNER, SCHILLINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68981
Plaintiff:
MELBA CAMBELL SMITH
Defendant:
A C & S INC , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Cambell et al
as 1:2008cv02235
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Cambell, Ruth Rush, Scot Haus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SPELLMAN v. HALL et al
as 2:2007cv04119
Plaintiff:
LONNIE (LIBEY) SPELLMAN
Defendant:
COLEMAN HALL, MANBECK, DIRECTOR NEWTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
