Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv16988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv16988
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 1:2015cv03368
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, BARACK OBAMA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. S. O.
as 14-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. O., M. O., DIRECTOR CIA and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. O.
Banks v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv03084
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. O., M. O., Director Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Banks v. United Safety Service, et al
as 13-4452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS, AN AMERICAN INDIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2013cv01615
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, BEN LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2013cv02697
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
United States of America, An unknown named Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v UNKNOWN
as 2:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
AN UNKNOWN NAMED NUMBER OF US POSTAL INSPECTORS, UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
