Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
KRAMER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2019cv00539
Defendant:
SHIRLEY EPPERSON, CITY OF PITTSBURGH, WILLIAM PEDUTO and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KRAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. COMMONWEALTH: et al
as 2:2016cv05534
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD GREENE
Defendant:
JOHN STEINHART and BRYAN MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN et al v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA
as 3:2013cv07459
Plaintiff:
EDWARD GREEN and DORIS GREEN
Defendant:
AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
DADUS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05859
Plaintiff:
AUDIE DADUS , MAXINE DAVIS , THEODORA DELCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edward Green v. Brian Thomphson
as 13-3212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN THOMPHSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GREENE v. THOMPHSON et al
as 2:2013cv02496
Petitioner:
EDWARD GREEN
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPHSON, RUFUS SETH WILLIAMS and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GREEN v. CURLEY et al
as 2:2011cv01811
Petitioner:
EDWARD GREEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL CURLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GREENE et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84142
Plaintiff:
BARBIE GREENE, BARBIE GREENE, DEAN EDWARD GREENE and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
