Cases 1 - 10 of 605
SANDERS GOODING v. BURLOTOS et al
as 2:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
SELENA SANDERS GOODING
Defendant:
ELENI BURLOTOS and USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 24-2132
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant:
SUZANNE V. HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
KELSO v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
DARNELL L. KELSO
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JOHN HARING, JASON COSTANZO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TWENTY-SIX DESIGNS, LLC v. CONQUEST SPORT GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv06377
Plaintiff:
TWENTY-SIX DESIGNS, LLC
Defendant:
CONQUEST SPORT GROUP LLC, THE TJX COMPANIES, INC., HOME GOODS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
DEPAOLA v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC.
as 3:2024cv06210
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEPAOLA
Defendant:
DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., ABC CO and JOHN DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal- Personal Injury
BALOGH et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BALOGH, GEORGE BAUMAN, BRIDGET COLLINS and others
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Godlewski v. Alvear Gonzalez, et al.
as 3:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Philip Godlewski
Defendant:
Eduardo Nicolas Alvear Gonzalez, Good Lion Films, L.L.C. and Good Lion TV, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GOODE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01668
Plaintiff:
JAMES GOODE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND v. DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 719 PENSION TRUST FUND
Defendant:
DICKS SPORTING GOODS, INC., EDWARD W STACK, NAVDEEP GUPTA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
