Cases 1 - 10 of 29
HAILE v. DEGNER
as 1:2023cv22861
Petitioner:
TONY HAILE
Respondent:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01031
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
FIELDS v. FREDRICK
as 1:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
HAILE S. FIELDS
Defendant:
OFFICER ROCCO FREDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALI v. ERIE COUNTY HOLDING FACILITY
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY HOLDING FACILITY
Plaintiff:
HAIL A. ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NATIONAL HAIL & DENT REMOVAL, LLC v. PORTERFIELD'S COLLISION CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv00366
Defendant:
PORTERFIELD'S COLLISION CENTER, INC. and SHERRY PORTERFILED
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL HAIL & DENT REMOVAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv14637
Plaintiff:
Catherine M. Mento, Randa Foda, Anna Arroyo and others
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC, PTI Royston, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02230
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HAILE v. CAMDEN COUNTY
as 1:2016cv06455
Plaintiff:
EDDIE HAILE
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Butler v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 14-3004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, SUPERVISOR KELVIN HEALEY, KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, Board Secretary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
