Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LAVIGNE v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
DONALD STANLEY LAVIGNE
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LAVIGNE v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
DONALD STANLEY LAVIGNE
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bolyen v. Zynga, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Susan Bolyen
Defendant:
Zynga, Inc., Mark Pincus, Frank Gibeau and others
WHITFIELD v. ZYNGA, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ZYNGA, INC., MARK PINCUS, FRANK GIBEAU and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
MOE et al v. WOODBRIDGE et al
as 2:2019cv14139
Defendant:
DEF CORP 1-10, SUPERVISOR PAULA POE 1-10, GHI CORP. 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
K. O., MARY MOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lutz v. Higgins et al
as 1:2018cv02044
Defendant:
Samuel R. Saks, Matthew M. Gosling, Gavin T. Molinelli and others
Nominal Defendant:
Assertio Therapeutics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Lutz
Carpenter v. Bishop et al
as 1:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Julie Carpenter
Defendant:
Hans E. Bishop, Steven D. Harr, Mark J. Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. CAST PARTS, INC et al
as 2:2012cv01656
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant:
CAST PARTS, INC, ENERGY CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC, GUTIERREZ MACHINE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
New Jersey Building Laborers Pension Fund v. Ball et al
as 1:2011cv01153
Plaintiff:
New Jersey Building Laborers Pension Fund
Defendant:
F. Michael Ball, Herbert W. Boyer, Deborah Dunsire and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
USA v. Scott Lavigne
as 11-2849
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT M. LAVIGNE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
