Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Peter Coyle v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER P. COYLE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, APS ASSOCIATES LLC, MIKE EDWARDS and others
COYLE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
PETER P. COYLE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE EDWARDS, UPPER SAUCON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YOUNG v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
LEONARD YOUNG and JI'HAAD HARRISON
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT LONNIE J. OLIVER, DEPUTY PATRICIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-2349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
John Butler v. Howard Sissem, et al
as 22-1371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD SISSEM, SGT DELANEY, sued in their individual capacities, JERI SMOCK and others
RIDGEWAY v. SMOCK et al
as 1:2020cv00200
Defendant:
JERI SMOCK, CHCA, MIKE EDWARDS, RNS, COI HALL and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE RIDGEWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KNEPP v. PARAWAY et al
as 1:2019cv00153
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL R. CLARK, NURSE PARAWAY, DR. A. HARTWELL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. KNEPP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUTLER v. SISSEM et al
as 1:2018cv00141
Plaintiff:
JOHN BUTLER
Defendant:
HOWARD SISSEM, DELANEY, JERI SMOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PAUL NOEL, JOSEPH SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. C.C.S. et al
as 1:2016cv00195
Plaintiff:
LEEVERNE JAMES
Defendant:
C.C.S., ANDREA NORRIS, CHRISTINE ZIRKLE, CHCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
