Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Ubry et al v. Metz Culinary Management, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ubry and Kevin Boyce
Defendant:
Metz Culinary Management, LLC, Metz Enterprises, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
MAPAY, LLC v. METZ et al
as 1:2023cv21678
Plaintiff:
MAPAY, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT METZ, ARMOUR OPS, LLC D/B/A ARMOUR LIFE SCIENCES, LLC, KATHRYN MERTES-EGELAND and others
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff:
DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant:
MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN HORN, METZ & CO., INC. v. PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.,
as 2:2023cv03596
Plaintiff:
VAN HORN, METZ & CO., INC.
Defendant:
PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Crawford v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Crawford
Defendant:
Dauphin County, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Warden Gregory Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
METZ et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02502
Plaintiff:
DANIEL METZ and SHERRI METZ
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
SALEEM v. METZ et al
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
NASIR SALEEM
Defendant:
K. METZ, SMITH, SCI GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
