Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06715
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mack v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00300
Defendant:
Assoc. Warden Jeffrey Butler, Lt. Kemmerer, Captain J. Rhodes and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Mack
Amicus Curiae:
Lt. Dallas Beachel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE , M. ROBINOWITZ , J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ari Bailey, et al
as 18-1956
Petitioner:
In re: ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAUERS and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bailey v. Kane et al
as 3:2017cv02105
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Blake R. Davis, M. D. Caravajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
JOHNSON v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv04978
Petitioner:
BRIAN ANTWANIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCreary et al v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jusamuel Rodriguez McCreary , Richard C. Anamanya and Joseph R. Coppola
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane and David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
