Securities/Commodities/Exchanges Cases filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina matching "S"
Cases 31 - 40 of 829,437
Arjmandi v. RW Supply and Design, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00704
Plaintiff: Parvin Arjmandi
Defendant: RW Supply and Design, LLC and Teckton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
USA v. Paul Harmon
as 24-2057
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: PAUL HARMON
USA v. Wilson
as 24-60277
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Toshemie Wilson
JER Creative Food Concepts, Inc. v. Create A Pack Foods, Inc.
as 24-1982
Plaintiff: JER CREATIVE FOOD CONCEPTS, INC.
Defendant: CREATE A PACK FOODS, INC.
Blanca Sucuzhanay-Mendia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2059
Petitioner: BLANCA AZUCENA SUCUZHANAY-MENDIA and N. F. S.-S.
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Inoa v. Dziduch
as 24-1524
Plaintiff: JOSE INOA
Defendant: L.T. DZIDUCH, L.T. ENSER, L.T. DELANEY and others
Oak Grove Management Company, LLC, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1184
Petitioner: Oak Grove Management Company, LLC and Luminant Generation Company LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02181
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ST. MATTHEWS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH WOODLYN PA v. BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01478
Plaintiff: ST. MATTHEWS EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH WOODLYN PA
Defendant: BROTHERHOOD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Felix-Razo v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02186
Petitioner: Alexis Felix-Razo
Respondent: Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?