Cases 1 - 10 of 308
Rivers v. United States
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Rivers
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rivers v. United States
as 5:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Rivers
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Greenbrier River Watershed Association, Center for Biological Diversity, Appalachian Voices and others
Defendant:
Jason Hattersley, United States Forest Service and Randy Moore
Intervenor:
South Fork Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Catawba Riverkeeper v. EPA
as 24-1483
Petitioner:
CATAWBA RIVERKEEPER and WINYAH RIVERS ALLIANCE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan and Adam Ortiz
Intervenor:
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and West Virginia Coal Association
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Broad River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Gaffney Board of Public Works
as 7:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Broad River Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant:
Gaffney Board of Public Works
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ALG Trustee LLC v. Bullen et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
ALG Trustee LLC
Respondent:
Robert R. Bullen, Internal Revenue Service and River Knolls Homeowners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
South River Capital v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2023cv02371
Plaintiff:
South River Capital
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 4010 Expedited Funds Availability: Violation of Act (Civil Liability)
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant:
ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent:
CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee:
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver:
MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
