Cases 41 - 50 of 5,750
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson-Buisson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00603
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson and Jeremy Leigh Watson-Buisson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cecil v. Novak
as 7:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
James Lee Cecil, Jr.
Defendant:
Wellpath Health Services and Dr. Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Monroe, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Evans Jr. v. VADOC
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
George Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
VADOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Ka Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Moore v. Warden Robert Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Robert Gary Moore
Defendant:
Warden Robert Weber, Officer Mimmick, Officer Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
