Cases 91 - 100 of 20,561
Flemons v. President Biden
as 2:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Joanna Rae Flemons
Defendant:
President Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Quadir v. The South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles
as 4:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Muhammad W.K.A. Quadir
Defendant:
The South Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dallas v. Sheidy et al
as 1:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Dallas
Defendant:
Georgia J. Sheidy, Patient First Corporation doing business as Patient First Primary and Urgent Care - Aberdeen and Patient First Maryland Medical Group, P.L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fitch et al v. Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sykes Fitch, Mark Mixon, Sherryreed Robinson and others
Defendant:
Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners, Nathan Everett, Nina Griswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ford v. Wormuth
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Ford
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Deshawn Taylor
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
Deshawn Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Civil Rights
Alexander Asanov v. FBI
as 24-1461
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER N. ASANOV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/ FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, BELINDA KELLER SUKEENA, TANYA A. PLEKAN and others
JACOBSEN v. CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
KAREN JACOBSEN
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Marsh v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Kirk Russell Marsh
Defendant:
State of Utah, Michael Edwards and Dana Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
