Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Yellin v. Quiroz, Jr., et al
as 1:2024cv01216
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Karl R. Hade, Jose Quiroz and others
Plaintiff:
Laura Yellin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Mithun Banerjee v. Timothy Branigan
as 24-1184
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant:
MR. TIMOTHY P. BRANIGAN, JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE, PJM, JUDGE MARIA ELLENA CHAVEZ-RUARK, MCR and others
Banerjee v. Branigan et al
as 8:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Defendant:
Mr. Timothy Branigan, Judge Peter Jo Messitte, Judge Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
LaBreche v. Chambers et al
as 1:2021cv00271
Plaintiff:
Andrew LaBreche
Defendant:
David Chambers, Tommy Davis, Robert Martelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer et al v. Summey et al
as 2:2021cv02952
Plaintiff:
Sean Bauer, Giovanni Brown, Alexis Chavez and others
Defendant:
R. Keith Summey and City of North Charleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Bailey et al
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Afarrah Chardae Sanders
Defendant:
Ryan Bailey, Cody McIntyre, Derek Deaton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NISLEY et al v. VAUGHAN et al
as 1:2020cv00297
Plaintiff:
JOLENE TROYER, DAVID TROYER, JOSIAH CHAVEZ and others
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT DAN KNOTT and NANCY VAUGHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ALVAREZ et al
as 1:2019cv00930
Defendant:
S.A. ALVAREZ, F.T. WRIGHT, WAYNE SCOTT and others
Plaintiff:
ZARED KINAH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. General Electric Company et al
as 1:2019cv00196
Defendant:
Yoh Services, Allison M. Lue, Mike Hall and others
Plaintiff:
Franklyn K. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chavez v. Havertys Furniture Company et al
as 1:2016cv00868
Plaintiff:
Josephine D. Chavez
Defendant:
Havertys Furniture Company, Kathy Heaton, Tom Mapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
