Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Casanova v. Pfizer and Affiliates et al
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Pfizer and Affiliates, Actalent Temporary Agency and Affiliates, GRAIL INC. and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ashley Casanova v. Joe Biden
as 24-1235
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY CASANOVA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Peter Gakuba v. April
as 23-2303
Plaintiff:
PETER GAKUBA
Defendant:
APRIL, Customer Service, USPS, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pakuja Vang v. Catawba Medical Center
as 23-1711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAKUJA CRYSTAL VANG
Defendant / Appellee:
CATAWBA MEDICAL CENTER, CATAWBA VALLEY FAMILY MEDICINE CLAREMONT, BETHANY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Casanova v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Federal Government, North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oakley v. DeJoy
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Bryan Oakley
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service and Louis Dejoy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Gakuba v. April et al
as 1:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
Peter Gakuba
Defendant:
April, United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.
as 1:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, INTERNAL SERVICE REVENUE and POST MASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lusk v. Peppers et al
as 8:2021cv01976
Defendant:
Chris Merchant, United States Postal Service, April Peppers and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Honeycutt v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2020cv00449
Plaintiff:
Aaron Honeycutt
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
