Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rodney Pierce v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1095
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
ROY A. COOPER, III and JOSHUA STEIN
Rodney Pierce v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 23-2317
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. PIERCE and MOSES MATTHEWS
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALAN HIRSCH, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
WILLIAMS et al v. HALL et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
SHAUNA WILLIAMS, FLOR HERRERA-PICASSO, MINERVA FREEMAN and others
Defendant:
DESTIN HALL, WARREN DANIEL, RALPH E. HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Manship, Sr. v. Kevin McCarthy
as 23-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RENWICK MANSHIP, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN MCCARTHY, Speaker of the House, Congress of the United States of America, KAMALA D. HARRIS, President of the Senate, Congress of the United States of America, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Shernoff et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03654
Defendant:
Clifford J Edler, Scott Moseley, Howard M Knapp and others
Plaintiff:
DSCC and JoAnn Shernoff
Intervenor Defendant:
South Carolina Republican Party and Speaker of the South James H. Lucas
Interested Party:
Albertus Clea, Family Unit, George Hopkins and others
Petitioner:
Senator Harvey Peeler and James ("Jay") H. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of South Carolina et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03537
Plaintiff:
Family Unit Inc, The, League of Women Voters of South Carolina, George Hopkins and others
Defendant:
Clifford J Edler, Linda McCall, Scott Moseley and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Senator Harvey Peeler, James H. (Jay) Lucas and Representative James H. (Jay) Lucas
Amicus Curiae:
South Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans and Attorney General Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purisima et al v. County of Arlington, Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv00065
Defendant:
Donald Payne, Jr., Jacky Rosen, Abby Finkenauer and others
Plaintiff:
Does 1-100, United States of America and Anton Purisima
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. COOPER et al
as 1:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
WINSTON SALEM - FORSYTH COUNTY NAACP, CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO NAACP, MOORE COUNTY NAACP and others
Defendant:
KEN RAYMOND, STELLA ANDERSON, JAY HEMPHILL and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives and Philip E. Berger, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Raleigh Wake Citizens Assoc v. Wake County Board of Election
as 16-1270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALEIGH WAKE CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, JANNET B. BARNES, BEVERLEY S. CLARK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Defendant:
CHAD BAREFOOT, in his official capacity as Senator and primary sponsor of SB 181, PHILLIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Carolina Senate and TIM MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives
Walterboro, City of et al v. Senator Clementa C Pinckney et al
as 2:2014cv03231
Plaintiff:
Walterboro, City of , Colleton County Council , Colleton County School Board and others
Defendant:
Senator Clementa C Pinckney , George E Campsen, III , Senator C Bradley Hutto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
