Voting Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Grant et al v. Knapp et al
as 2:2023cv06838
Plaintiff: Trudy B Grant, Sarah Krawcheck, Nashonda Hunter and others
Defendant: Howard Knapp, John Wells, JoAnne Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff: Colby Sean Wells
Defendant: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Zigmantanis et al v. McMaster et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02872
Plaintiff: Donna Zigmantanis, Faith M. Dowden, Meredith Mumpower and others
Defendant: Henry McMaster, Henry Knapp, Wanda Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shernoff et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03654
Defendant: Clifford J Edler, Scott Moseley, Howard M Knapp and others
Plaintiff: DSCC and JoAnn Shernoff
Intervenor Defendant: South Carolina Republican Party and Speaker of the South James H. Lucas
Interested Party: Albertus Clea, Family Unit, George Hopkins and others
Petitioner: Senator Harvey Peeler and James ("Jay") H. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina Progressive Network Education Fund v. Andino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03503
Defendant: Marci Andino, Linda McCall, Clifford J. Edler and others
Plaintiff: South Carolina Progressive Network Education Fund
Petitioner: James H. Lucas, Jay and Harvey Peeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of South Carolina et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03537
Plaintiff: Family Unit Inc, The, League of Women Voters of South Carolina, George Hopkins and others
Defendant: Clifford J Edler, Linda McCall, Scott Moseley and others
Intervenor Defendant: Senator Harvey Peeler, James H. (Jay) Lucas and Representative James H. (Jay) Lucas
Amicus Curiae: South Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans and Attorney General Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Andino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01552
Plaintiff: Family Unit Inc, The, Dr Brenda Williams, Trena Walker and others
Defendant: Scott Moseley, Henry D McMaster, Marci Andino and others
Intervenor: South Carolina Republican Party
Interested Party: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: Attorney General Alan Wilson and Protection and Advocacy for People with Disabilities Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina Democratic Party et al v. Andino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03308
Defendant: Clifford J Edler, Scott Moseley, Marci Andino and others
Plaintiff: DSCC, South Carolina Democratic Party and DCCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant: CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
League of Women Voters of NC v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: LOUIS M. DUKE, CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?