Cases 1 - 10 of 16,213
Medical Clinic of Houston LLP v. AKOS MD IPA LLC
as 2:2024mc00020
Plaintiff:
Medical Clinic of Houston LLP
Defendant:
AKOS MD IPA LLC doing business as Apricus Health Network
J.C. v. St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
J. C.
Defendant:
St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc. and Kenneth A. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
City of San Diego v. Manchester Pacific Gateway, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
City of San Diego
Defendant:
Manchester Pacific Gateway, LLC, Manchester Financial Group, AMG Demolition & Environmental Service Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 oc Removal- Other Contract
Jacobi v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
Gary Jacobi
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ewing v. Premium Merchant Funding One, LLC
as 3:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
Premium Merchant Funding One, LLC
Hamilton v. Crete Carrier Corporation
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Demarea Hamilton
Defendant:
Crete Carrier Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hughes v. Bobby Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Darren Tranell Hughes
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Harris County, Fort Bend County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
