Cases 151 - 160 of 36,651
Bardomiano Martinez v. Steven Jacobs
as 24-6251
Petitioner:
BARDOMIANO MARTINEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britney Bates v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6431
Petitioner:
BRITNEY ODELL BATES
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Benson v. Warden, FCI Edgefield
as 0:2024cv01195
Petitioner:
Rahshjeem Benson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Montgomery v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02091
Petitioner:
Louvertis Kayonne Montgomery
Respondent:
Warden Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
As-Salafi v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Abdul-Malik As-Salafi
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bell v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Jaylen Dalaino Bell
Respondent:
United States and Jackson County of Ripley, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Porter v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2024hc02077
Petitioner:
Wayne Porter
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
