Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Randolph Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6280
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of D.O.C.
LAMBERT v. RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
BRANSON LAMBERT
Respondent:
RANDOLPH COUNTY COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ballin v. Shepler
as 5:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Matthew James Ballin
Respondent:
Randolph County Magistrate Ben E. Shepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Dunbar
as 5:2022cv03677
Petitioner:
Phillip Randolph Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
R S Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDowell v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv01382
Petitioner:
Randolph McDowell
Respondent:
State of Maryland, Baltimore City Circuit Court and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph v. McFadden
as 3:2021cv00651
Petitioner:
Charles B Randolph
Respondent:
Gary L. McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Randolph v. McFadden
as 3:2021cv00538
Petitioner:
Charles B Randolph
Respondent:
Gary L. McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banshee v. McMaster et al
as 6:2021cv02602
Petitioner:
Mansa M Y Banshee
Respondent:
Henry McMaster, Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Probation Parole Pardon Services The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Quay et al
as 8:2020cv02894
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Maryland and WARDEN QUAY
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH S. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Voltz-Loomis et al v. McMaster et al
as 5:2020cv01533
Petitioner:
Allen Slaughter, Jeanne Voltz-Loomis, Jane Roes 1 through 10 and others
Respondent:
Mollie Dupriest Taylor, Dan Batson, Christopher F Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
